Skip to main content

Table 1 Descriptive statistics for maximum application scores in census tracts and category definitions (n = 606 census tracts)

From: State licenses for medical marijuana dispensaries: neighborhood-level determinants of applicant quality in Missouri

 

All denied

1 or more approved

 

Variables

Mean

(S.D)

Mean

(S.D.)

Definitions and weights for application categories

Total Score

(0–100%)

69.496

(10.630)

79.401**

(2.152)

The overall percentage score that a dispensary applicant received on the Missouri application for a medical marijuana license. [Weight = 100%]

Dispensary Supplement

(0–100%)

68.100

(12.053)

78.176**

(5.53)

Questions focused on fundamental issues for operating a dispensary, such as the suitability of the site, accessibility to patients, healthcare-related experience among dispensary staff, and the availability of physicians and pharmacists for consultations. [Weight = 20%]

Business Plan

(0–100%)

67.572

(10.686)

75.912**

(4.109)

Questions covered employee recruitment and training, inventory management, product pricing, marketing, accounting/fiscal controls, and budget projections. Applicants were required to provide proof of adequate financial capitalization, liability insurance coverage, and the legal right to use the facility indicated on the application. [Weight = 20%]

Security

(0–100%)

52.876

(13.896)

67.714**

(8.076)

Applicants provided plans for preventing theft, illegal purchase, and unlawful entry. Applicants were required to provide details about employee screening and monitoring, on-site surveillance systems, and a facility’s physical infrastructure. [Weight = 20%]

Economic Impact

(0–100%)

58.237

(14.472)

70.305**

(9.369)

Applicants described how a dispensary would have a positive economic impact on the local area. They also provided estimates for the number of full-time equivalent jobs and the average hourly wage during the first year of operations. [Weight = 16%]

Character

(0–100%)

96.365

(5.230)

98.852**

(2.048)

The trustworthiness and background of all officers and managers were assessed. Applicants provided resumes, support letters, and information about prior compliance with laws related to taxes, federally funded programs, and other business practices. [Weight = 12%]

Experience

(0–100%)

91.322

(24.644)

100.000**

(0.000)

This section consisted of a single essay in which the applicant described the experience of each officer or manager in the legal cannabis market. [Weight = 8%]

Competition

(0–100%)

91.647

(27.700)

100.000**

(0.000)

This section consisted of a single essay in which the applicant described how the dispensary will be competitive in the market for medical marijuana products. [Weight = 4%]

  1. Note Sample means and standard deviations are reported for the maximum application scores across census tracts. There were 175 census tracts where at least one dispensary application was approved and 431 census tracts were all applicants were denied. Statistically significant differences in sample means across categories are denoted by * and ** for significance at the 5% and 1% levels, respectively