Skip to main content

Table 6 Synthetic control weights assigned to each state for broadly-defined agriculture labor market outcomes

From: Watching the grass grow: does recreational cannabis legalization affect retail and agricultural wages?

 

Log number of establishments

Log number of workers

Log real total quarterly wage

Log real average weekly wage per worker

Colorado

Arizona

0.19

0.26

0.12

0.00

Georgia

0.52

0.00

0.10

0.02

Hawaii

0.01

0.02

0.01

0.00

Kentucky

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.16

Minnesota

0.00

0.24

0.10

0.43

Montana

0.07

0.27

0.08

0.00

New Hampshire

0.00

0.05

0.22

0.00

South Dakota

0.21

0.00

0.00

0.00

Texas

0.00

0.15

0.29

0.02

Virginia

0.00

0.00

0.08

0.37

Washington

Connecticut

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.07

Florida

0.00

0.86

0.74

0.18

Michigan

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.69

Minnesota

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.05

Montana

0.07

0.00

0.00

0.00

Texas

0.93

0.12

0.24

0.00

  1. Notes: The table provides the weights assigned to states for the synthetic controls used to estimate the “broadly-defined agriculture” models in Table 2. All states except those which legalized cannabis during our study period and those bordering either Washington or Colorado were included in the pool of potential control units; Alaska and California were added to the pool for Washington due to the similarity in their agriculture, forestry, and fishing industries. Only states which received positive weight for at least one outcome are included in the table