Skip to main content

Table 5 Adjusted odds ratios (AOR) for driving under the influence

From: Recreational Cannabis Legislation: substance use and impaired driving among Canadian rural and urban postsecondary students

 

AOR (95% CI)

p Value

AOR (95% CI)

p Value

Operating a motor vehicle after using cannabis a

Lifetime

Past month

Province

 Manitoba (Ref)

---------------

 

---------------

 

 Ontario

0.76 (0.41 ; 1.39)

0.368

0.82 (0.35 ; 1.89)

0.637

 Quebec

0.89 (0.51 ; 1.55)

0.672

1.20 (0.58 ; 2.45)

0.629

Spent the majority of their life in

 Urban setting (Ref)

---------------

 

---------------

 

 Rural sitting

1.44 (0.91 ; 2.28)

0.119

1.67 (0.87 ; 3.20)

0.120

Interaction (Province x Spent the majority …)

 Ontario - Rural setting

1.10 (0.41 ; 2.91)

0.855

1.29 (0.37 ; 4.55)

0.694

 Quebec - Rural setting

0.31 (0.13 ; 0.78)

0.012*

0.20 (0.05 ; 0.73)

0.015*

Goodness of fit

 χ2(df; p)

29.31 (10; p = 0.001)

43.98 (11; p < 0.001)

 χ2 Hosmer and Lemeshow (df; p)

8.62 (8; p = 0.375)

11.11 (8; p =0.195)

 R2 de Nagelkerke

0.047

0.097

 Correct percentage classifying

86.8

93.3

Operating a motor vehicle after using alcohol a

Lifetime

Past month

Province

 Manitoba (Ref)

---------------

 

---------------

 

 Ontario

0.62 (0.39 ; 0.98)

0.041*

0.75 (0.41 ; 1.39)

0.359

 Quebec

0.90 (0.64 ; 1.27)

0.545

1.28 (0.81 ; 2.03)

0.285

Spent the majority of their life in

 Urban setting (Ref)

---------------

 

---------------

 

 Rural setting

1.46 (1.08 ; 1.96)

0.013*

1.25 (0.83 ; 1.87)

0.288

Goodness of fit

 χ2(df; p)

86.51 (7; p < 0.001)

45.55 (8; p < 0.001)

 χ2 Hosmer and Lemeshow (df; p)

5.50 (8; p = 0.703)

12.49 (8; p = 0.130)

R2 de Nagelkerke

0.11

0.080

 Correct percentage classifying

76.6

89.5

Operating a motor vehicle after using cannabis, alcohol, or illicit drugs a

Lifetime

Past month

Province

 Manitoba (Ref)

---------------

 

---------------

 

 Ontario

0.66 (0.44 ; 0.99)

0.042*

0.79 (0.48 ; 1.30)

0.356

 Quebec

0.82 (0.59 ; 1.14)

0.248

1.07 (0.71 ; 1.61)

0.750

Spent the majority of their life in

 Urban setting (Ref)

---------------

 

---------------

 

 Rural setting

1.46 (1.11 ; 1.92)

0.008**

1.32 (0.92 ; 1.88)

0.131

Goodness of fit

 χ2(df; p)

68.29 (6; p <0.001)

61.22 (10; p < 0.001)

 χ2 Hosmer and Lemeshow (df; p)

5.15 (7; p =0.642)

15.35 (8; p = 0.053)

R2 de Nagelkerke

0.084

0.092

 Correct percentage classifying

72.0

85.7

Passenger in a motor vehicle driven by someone under the influence of cannabis, alcohol, or illicit drugs

Lifetime

Past month

Province

 Manitoba (Ref)

---------------

 

---------------

 

 Ontario

0.53 (0.34 ; 0.82)

0.005**

0.47 (0.24 ; 0.94)

0.032*

 Quebec

1.31 (0.90 ; 1.93)

0.162

1.28 (0.75 ; 2.18)

0.374

Spent the majority of their life in

 Urban setting (Ref)

---------------

 

---------------

 

 Rural setting

1.21 (0.85 ; 1.72)

0.287

1.64 (1.03 ; 2.61)

0.037*

Interaction (Province x Spent the majority …)

---------------

---------------

 Ontario - Rural sitting

2.18 (1.06 ; 4.48)

0.033*

2.68 (1.01 ; 7.10)

0.048*

 Quebec - Rural setting

0.64 (0.36 ; 1.13)

0.119

0.38 (0.16 ; 0.90)

0.027*

Goodness of fit

 χ2(df; p)

61.38 (10; p <0.001)

44.26 (11; p < 0.001)

 χ2 Hosmer and Lemeshow (df; p)

10.99 (8; p =0.202)

2.93 (8; p = 0.939)

R2 de Nagelkerke

0.065

0.065

 Correct percentage classifying

70.9

88.4

  1. Data presented as adjusted odds ratios (with confidence interval of 95%) using logistic binary regression adjusted for sociodemographic variable (Ex. age, gender, first year of postsecondary enrollment, international/domestic students)
  2. AOR Adjusted odds ratio, CI Confident Interval, Ref Reference group
  3. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01
  4. aamong those who held a valid driver’s license