Skip to main content

Table 3 Matrix effects, absolute recovery and process efficiency for Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD), using dried oral fluid spots (DOFS) and weak anion exchange and salt (WAX-S) tips extraction

From: Study of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) extraction FROM dried oral fluid spots (DOFS) and LC–MS/MS detection

Drug

Matrix Effects*

(%)

CV

(%)

Absolute Recovery* (%)

CV

Process Efficiency *

(%)

CV

(%)

THC (N = 10)

DOFS

Low (12 ng/mL)

98.7

15.6

23.8

14.2

23.5

19.3

High (50 ng/mL)

80.3

17.3

25.3

13.9

20.3

20.7

WAX-S tips

Low (12 ng/mL)

92.4

6.8

90.7

6.2

83.8

4.0

CBD (N = 10)

DOFS

Low (12 ng/mL)

75.2

18.5

24.8

18.0

18.6

23.9

High (50 ng/mL)

76.4

18.7

28.7

17.6

21.9

23.8

WAX-S tips

Low (12 ng/mL)

87.5

7.0

93.2

8.7

81.6

5.5

  1. *Matrix effects: accessed by dividing post-spiked average and neat samples, multiplied by 100;
  2. *Process efficiency: accessed by dividing pre-spiked samples by neat samples, multiplied by 100;
  3. *Recovery: calculated dividing pre-spiked samples by post-spiked samples, multiplied by 100