Skip to main content

Table 2 Patterns of cannabis use in past year by socio-demographic indicators by lower and higher CLVSa scale score groups

From: Patterns and correlates of cannabis use by cumulative lifetime violence severity as target and/or perpetrator in a community sample of eastern Canadian men

 

Lower CLVS (n = 294)

Patterns of Cannabis Use

Higher CLVS (n = 295)

Patterns of Cannabis Use

Never (61.9%, n = 182)b

Sometimes (26.2%, n = 77)b

Daily (11.9%, n = 35) b

Chi- square

Never (44.7%, n = 132) b

Sometimes (25.1%, n = 74) b

Daily (30.2%, n = 89) b

Chi- square

Age Groups: n (%)

 -19 to 24

23 (12.6)

18 (23.4)

9 (25.7)

χ2 (4) = 13.57, p = .009, V = .152

10 (7.6)c

21 (28.4)c

16 (18.0)

χ2 (4) = 22.06, p = .000, V = .193

 -25 to 44

99 (54.4)

42 (54.5)

23 (65.7)

65 (49.2)

39 (52.7)

46 (51.7)

 -45 to 65

60 (33.0)

17 (22.1)

3 (8.6)c

57 (43.2)c

14 (18.9)c

27 (30.3)

Marital Status: n (%)

 

(n = 76)

   

(n = 73)

(n = 88)

 

 -Married or Living with Partner

124 (68.1)

41 (53.9)

14 (40.0)

χ2 (2) = 11.98, p = .003, V = .202

103 (78.0)c

29 (39.7) c

39 (44.3)

χ2 (2) = 38.59, p = .000, V = .363

 -Single, Divorced, or Separated

58 (31.9)

35 (46.1)

21 (60.0)c

29 (22.0) c

44 (60.3) c

49 (55.7) c

Highest Level of Education: n (%)

  

(n = 34)

     

 -High School Diploma or less

26 (14.3)

16 (20.8)

11 (32.4)c

χ2 (4) = 10.80,p = .029, V = .136

32 (24.2)

20 (27.0)

37 (41.6) c

χ2 (4) = 22.55, p = .000, V = .196

 -Some Post-Secondary Education

47 (25.8)

22 (28.6)

12 (35.3)

27 (20.5)

27 (36.5)

29 (32.6)

 -College or University Degree/Diploma

109 (59.9)

39 (50.6)

11 (32.4) c

73 (55.3) c

27 (36.5

23 (25.8) c

Community Size: n (%)

 

(n = 76)

      

 -Rural (<  1000)

22 (12.1)

11 (14.5)

3 (8.6)

χ2 (6) = 5.25, p = .512, V = .095

21 (15.9)

8 (10.8)

10 (11.2)

χ2 (6) = 19.22, p = .004, V = .180

 -Small town (1000 to 29,999)

43 (23.6)

12 (15.8)

5 (14.3)

38 (28.8)

17 (23.0)

9 (10.1) c

 -Medium city (30,000 to 99,999)

101 (55.5)

45 (59.2)

21 (60.0)

65 (49.2)

43 (58.1)

54 (60.7)

 -Large city (>  100,000)

16 (8.8)

8 (10.5)

6 (17.1)

 

8 (6.1)

6 (8.1)

16 (18.0) c

Currently Employed: n (%)

 -Yes

145 (79.7)

60 (77.9)

22 (69.2)

χ2 (2) = 4.75, p = .093, V = .127

95 (72.0)

51 (68.9)

37 (41.6) c

χ2 (2) = 22.84, p = .000, V = .278

 -No

37 (20.3)

17 (22.1)

13 (37.1)

37 (28.0)

23 (31.1)

52 (58.4) c

Total Personal Income Past Year: n (%)

(n = 181)

(n = 76)

      

 < $25,000

56 (30.9)

28 (36.8)

19 (54.3)

χ2 (4) = 14.87,p = .005, V = .160

42 (31.8) c

44 (59.5)

59 (66.3) c

χ2 (4) = 42.02, p = .000, V = .267

 $25,000 to $49,999

39 (21.5)

21 (27.6)

11 (31.4)

26 (19.7)

14 (18.9)

20 (22.5)

 = > $50,000

86 (47.5)

27 (35.5)

5 (14.3)c

64 (48.5) c

16 (21.6)

10 (11.2) c

Difficulty Living on Income: n (%)

 -Not at all or somewhat difficult

143 (79.0)

52 (68.4)

17 (48.6)

χ2 (2) = 14.56, p = .001, V = .223

90 (68.2) c

37 (50.0)

28 (31.8) c

χ2 (2) = 28.30, p = .000, V = .310

 -Difficult to extremely difficult

38 (21.0)

24 (31.6)

18 (51.4) c

42 (31.8) c

37 (50.0)

60 (68.2) c

  1. a Cumulative Lifetime Violence Severity
  2. b Unless otherwise specified
  3. c Standardized Residual > ± 1.96